Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In arm-linux-gnueabihf cross, after: | 89 commits in gcc | b651c9d3f37 ginclude: Add comments to and about deprecated macros | bc722b74edc libstdc++: Fix phony target name in doc/Makefile.am | a6c2657fc6a c++/reflection: members_of includes cdtor clones [PR127643] | 0a1b2250a96 s390: Improve build time | 36b936de196 genattr: Define number of mnemonics | ... and 84 more commits in gcc Produces 6 regressions 4 fixes: | | regressions.sum: | Running gfortran:gfortran.dg/dg.exp ... | FAIL: gfortran.dg/associate_90.f90 -O0 execution test | FAIL: gfortran.dg/associate_90.f90 -O1 execution test | FAIL: gfortran.dg/associate_90.f90 -O2 execution test | FAIL: gfortran.dg/associate_90.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions execution test | ... and 2 more | | fixes.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.dg/tree-ssa/tree-ssa.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/minmax-swar-5.c scan-tree-dump-not forwprop1 "